English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

has offered a description of his effort in the present symposium.3 It is with considerable misgivings that I have accepted the editor's invitation to comment on this paper. I have stated elsewhere, perhaps all too often and all too vigorously, my opposition to both the substance and the procedure of the American Law Institute's undertaking in this field.4 Moreover, it is always a hateful task to attack the work of a man for whom you feel the highest personal regard. Only the remaining hope to induce the Restaters to withdraw their latest draft on the conflicts law of torts5 has prompted me to offer these comments despite my misgivings.

The "Most Significant Relationship" in the Conflicts Law of Torts. Law and Reason versus the Restatement Second