English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Under the impetus of Title IX of the Social Security Act we hope for the rapid spread of state unemployment compensation laws.' The form these laws will take depends in large measure on decisions to be made in the several states. The federal standards are few in number. In addition to many questions of detail, each state must decide two basic questions: (i) Who should contribute to the unemployment compensation fund: employers only, or employees (and perhaps the state) as well? (2) How should the fund be set up: on an employer reserve basis; or as a state-wide insurance pool, with or without some provision for merit rating? The first of these questions is fully treated elsewhere in this symposium. This paper is addressed to the second question. After stating briefly the essential differences between the two systems, it will discuss the purposes of unemployment compensation and explain why in the writer's opinion these purposes can best be served by an employer reserve set-up. The rest of the paper will be devoted to an analysis of the special problems arising under that system, and the ways in which and the extent to which these problems can be solved.

The Employer Reserve Type of Unemployment Compensation Law