English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

The new Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act embodies the most drastic consequence thus far produced by a recent important tendency in federal legislation to impose strict procedural requirements upon regulatory agencies in the exercise of rule-making powers and to subject the resulting regulations to a high degree of judicial review.' Heretofore the adoption of general regulations by administrative action, even where penal consequences attached to their violation, has not been surrounded by the safeguards that attend a judicial proceeding or an administrative proceeding of a "quasijudicial" character.2 Under the new Act, however, as under a number of other recent federal laws,3 the Secretary of Agriculture and his agents in the Food and Drug Adrrministration are required to observe a careful procedure in devising numerous important regulations, and these regulations, in turn, are subject to judicial review in the Circuit Courts of Appeals.4 The resulting process resembles the previous machinery for prescribing public utility rates, rather than that employed in devising health and safety regulations, whether by the Food and Drug Administration itself or by other agencies.5

The Formulation and Review of Regulations under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act