English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

While less direct in their application than other types of legislation, chain store taxes are none the less marketing barriers in the broad sense in which the term is used in this symposium.' Their effect-indeed their avowed purpose-is to obstruct one channel of distribution in order to divert the flow of goods into other channels. This article discusses three phases of the subject: first, the history of chain store taxes and their treatment at the hands of the courts; second, other legislation with an anti-chain store "flavor," such as the Robinson-Patman Act, fair trade laws, sales-below-cost laws, and state price discrimination laws; and third, some of the economic effects of the foregoing, including devices used for their minimization.

Legislative Opposition to Chain Stores and Its Minimization