English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Criminologists, policymakers, and the public have been very concerned about variation in criminal sentences during the last ten years. Whether arguing on grounds of fairness, leniency, severity, or justice, few people seem to be without opinions on the causes of, or solutions to, unwarranted disparity in criminal sentencing.' While states are scrambling to implement their own favorite remedies, it is interesting to know that the problem has been with us for quite some time. In fact, the search for "solutions" to the disparity problem has probably existed for as long as sentence lengths have been dependent upon judicial discretion.2

Concern about Variation in Criminal Sentences: A Cyclical History of Reform