English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

S OF RECENT CASES Failure To Deny Incriminatory Statements Made by Co-conspirator Is Admissible in Evidence Against Silent Defendant-Petitioner, a Negro, was convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to death. A confession made by petitioner was excluded at the trial as involuntary, since it was obtained after a law enforcement officer informed the defendant that a large group of white people was looking for him. After defendant had been incarcerated, his co-conspirators confessed the crime and implicated the defendant by statements made in his presence. Petitioner refused to affirm or deny the accusations levelled against him. Upon -appeal the Supreme Court of Arkansas held that petitioner's failure to deny the accusations made by his co-conspirators was admissible in evidence against him as an admission, since their statements were made in his presence while he was in custody and thus secure from possible mob violence. Boyd v. State, 328 S.W.2d

The Applicability of the Bill of Rights to a Court-Martial Proceeding