English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

patterns might be expected. It is usually asserted that the blood pressure cuff on the wrist is more comfortable; and, therefore, permits the recording of a slightly longer test. It is also generally conceded that the wrist-cuff produces a somewhat smaller pattern. Accepting the general observation that the wrist-cuff or radial-ulnar pattern is smaller than a recording from the upper arm or brachial pattern, the essential question is whether or not there is a qualitative difference. The question of quality here involves legibility and reaction. As for legibility, there does not appear to be any practical problem with instruments manufactured during the last few years. There have been a few cases where the radial-ulnar pattern was insufficient. These cases were readily handled with the more customary brachial recording. The occasional instance where the radial-ulnar pattern is insufficient does not present a serious problem because all instruments that utilize a wrist-cuff will also use an arm-cuff. The important factor in changing the size of the blood-pressure cuff is in noting the possibility of errors in chart interpretation. This will be discussed in more detail later. To achieve a useful knowledge of the differences in these two types of patterns, two programs were followed. In the first, over four hundred charts of each type were reviewed. These charts were all from regular cases (not experimental). Second, a series of experiments were conducted in which simultaneous recordings were used. That is, a wrist-cuff on one arm and an arm-cuff on the other.

A Comparison of Arm-Cuff and Wrist-Cuff Blood Pressure Patterns in Polygraph Charts