English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Advances in the understanding of coal–gas adsorption characteristics have changed the manner in which we enhance coalbed methane (ECBM) recovery through other gas injection into the coalbed (eg. pure/a mixture of CO2 and N2)[1-3]. They are different ECBM mechanisms between with CO2 and N2 as injectants. When CO2 is injected, CH4 is displaced from coal because of the stronger adsorption of CO2. While N2 as injectant, CH4 is desorbed from coal due to the reduction of the partial , Jing-Yu MENG, You-Pai WANG, Jian-Hong KANG, Hong-Yun REN

Roles of adsorption potential and surface free energy on pure CH4 and CO2 adsorption under different temperatures