English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The main purpose of this paper is to establish the connection between   gentrification and planning, as a form of state and civil intervention, along   with citing instances of local community reactions to negative effects of   gentrification. The work examines how these two forms of public intervention,   by means of implementing measures/actions, influence positive and negative   effects of gentrification and contribute to maintaining balance between them.   Furthermore, it explains how they act in service of public interest. The main   criterion for the selection of research examples has been the form of   intervention implemented (measures/actions, that is, their diversity). Most   examples have been drawn from the USA where, on account of its liberal   economic system, the power of planning is weaker, negative effects of   gentrification are more dominant and gentrification itself is considered a   negative phenomenon. The main objective of the analysis is to determine how   to minimize the negative effects. A small number of examples presented have   been taken from developed European countries, since those states exert   stronger influence on planning and the state/community is more responsible   for housing problems and existence of different groups of individuals in the   community. Those instances illustrate the maximization of positive effects.   In addition, some examples have been drawn from transitional, post-socialist   Balkan countries where anti-planning attitude is dominant and negative   effects of gentrification are more present. Given their effects on   gentrification, the most successful measures/actions, applied in the form of   public intervention, ordered by category, are as follows: affordable housing,   jobs, local regulations, partnership and direct actions

Influence of planning and civil initiative, as a form of public intervention, on gentrification