English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

. For a long time, The Institute for Scientific Information (ISI,  now Thomson Scientific, Philadelphia, US) citation databases, available  online through the Web of Science (WoS), had an unique position among  bibliographic databases. The emergence of new citation databases, such as  Scopus and Google Scholar (GS), call in question the dominance of WoS and the  accuracy of bibliometric and citation studies exclusively based on WoS data.  The aim of this study was to determine whether there were significant  differences in the received citation counts for Serbian Dental Journal (SDJ)  found in WoS and Scopus databases, or whether GS results differed  significantly from those obtained by WoS and Scopus, and whether GS could be  an adequate qualitative alternative for commercial databases in the impact  assessment of this journal. Material and Methods. The data regarding SDJ  citation was collected in September 2010 by searching WoS, Scopus and GS  databases. For further analysis, all relevant data of both, cited and citing  articles, were imported into Microsoft Access® database. Results. One hundred  and fifty-eight cited papers from SDJ and 249 received citations were found  in the three analyzed databases. 74% of cited articles were found in GS, 46%  in Scopus and 44% in WoS. The greatest number of citations (189) was derived  from GS, while only 15% of the citations, were found in all three databases.  There was a significant difference in the percentage of unique citations  found in the databases. 58% originated from GS, while Scopus and WoS gave 6%  and 4% unique citations, respectively. The highest percentage of databases  overlap was found between WoS and Scopus (70%), while the overlap between  Scopus and GS was 18% only. In case of WoS and GS the overlap was 17%. Most  of the SDJ citations came from original scientific articles. Conclusion. WoS,  Scopus and GS produce quantitatively and qualitatively different citation  counts for SDJ articles. None of the examined databases can provide a  comprehensive picture and it is necessary to take into account all three  available sources

A citation analysis of Serbian Dental Journal using Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar