English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

It has recently been reported that some of the flux density values for anevolved supernova remnant (SNR) HB 3 (G132.7 + 1.3) are not accurate. In thiswork we revised an analysis of the possible thermal emission at radiofrequencies from the SNR HB 3 using the recently published, corrected, fluxdensity values. A model including a sum of non-thermal (purely synchrotron) andthermal (bremsstrahlung) component is applied for fitting integrated radiospectrum of the SNR. The contribution of thermal component in total volumeemissivity at $1 \mathrm{GHz}$ was estimated to be $\approx37 %$. The ambientdensity was also estimated to be $n\approx 9 \mathrm{cm}^{-3}$ for the$\mathrm{T}=10^{4} \mathrm{K}$. Again, we obtained the relatively significantpresence of thermal emission at radio frequencies from the SNR so we couldsupport interaction between SNR HB 3 and adjacent molecular cloud associatedwith the H {\sc ii} region W3. Our model estimates for thermal componentcontribution to total volume emissivity at $1 \mathrm{GHz}$ and ambient densityare similar to those obtained earlier ($\approx40 %$, $\approx10\mathrm{cm^{-3}}$). It is clear that the corrected flux density values do notchange the basic conclusions.

An analysis of the possible thermal emission at radio frequencies from an evolved supernova remnant HB 3 (G132.7 + 1.3): revisited