English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Two reasons are mainly brought to explain the recent increase in intra-country wage inequality in favour of high-skilled labour: Skill-Biased Technological Change (SBTC) and International Trade Liberalisation (IT). Since few empirical studies have attempted to assess both interpretations across a comprehensive sample of countries, we have analysed the impact of both and added some new variables within a unified framework and across 30 OECD countries, between 2001 and 2015. Using panel data, results show that both explanations are crucial. However, considering all 30 OECD countries, the IT argument dominates. Further, we show that seven clusters must be considered in which at least one theory influence the wage gap. Key words: Skill-biased technological change, International trade, Immigration, Education, Wage inequality, Cluster analysis. JEL: C23, F41, J31, O33, O50. Dva razloga uglavnom objasnjavaju rastuce povecanje nejednakosti zarada unutar zemalja u korist visoko-kvalifikovanih radnika: tehnoloske promene zasnovane na vestinama (SBCT) i međunarodna trgovinska liberalizacija (IT). Buduci da je nekoliko empirijskih studija pokusalo da proceni oba tumacenja preko sveobuhvatnog uzorka zemalja, mi smo analizirali oba uticaja i dodali neke nove varijable u jedinstveni okvir od 30 zemalja OECD-a, između 2001. i 2015. godine. Koristeci podatke panela, rezultati pokazuju da su oba objasnjenja od presudnog znacaja. Međutim, posmatrajuci svih 30 zemalja OECD-a, IT argumenti dominiraju. Dalje, pokazujemo da sedam klastera mora da se razmatra u kojima najmanje jedna teorija uticu na razliku u zaradama. Kljucne reci: Tehnoloske promene zasnovane na vestinama, međunarodna trgovina, imigracije, obrazovanje, nejednakost zarada, klaster analiza.

Intra-country wage inequality in the OECD countries