English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We consider a monopoly firm producing a good and, at the same time, polluting   and using fossil energy. By incurring an investment cost, this firm can adopt   a lower production cost clean technology using renewable energy. We determine   the optimal adoption date for the firm in the case where it is not regulated   at all and in the case where it is regulated at each period. Interestingly,   the regulated firm adopts the clean technology earlier than what is socially   optimal, as opposed to the nonregulated firm. The regulator can induce the   firm to adopt the clean technology at the socially optimal date by a postpone   adoption subsidy. Nevertheless, the regulator may be interested in the   earlier adoption of the firm to encourage the diffusion of the use of clean   technologies in other industries

Timing of adoption of clean technologies by regulated monopolies