English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Hiatuses in semi-enclosed basins can be caused by either eustatic falls or   local tectonic uplifts. The Ciscaucasian basin is located in the south of   European Russia. In the Neogene, it belonged to the Eastern Paratethys   domain. On the basis of available stratigraphic data, four major hiatuses are   traced in this basin as erosional surfaces or lengthy sedimentation breaks,   namely the Tarkhanian, Middle/Upper Sarmatian, Sarmatian/Maeotian, and   Kimmerian hiatuses. They are documented in most of the areas of the study   basin. The three earlier hiatuses mark short-term and nearly isochronous,   basinwide sedimentation breaks, whereas the latter hiatus is diachronous,   embracing more than 2 myr. All reported hiatuses record the eustatic falls.   Consequently, we argue that eustatic processes controlled sedimentation in   the Ciscaucasian basin throughout the entire Neogene. This means the basin   was connected to the open ocean throughout this period, with important   consequences for our understanding of watermass history in the Mediterranean   and Paratethyan basins further west and south

Do major neogene hiatuses in the Ciscaucasian semi-enclosed basin (Eastern Paratethys, southwestern Russia) record eustatic falls?