English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

. The core idea behind the Implicit Association Test (IAT) is toobtain information that are not the result of controlled processes. Therefore, it isconsidered a technique with the potential to overcome some disadvantages of explicitmeasures, such as socially desirable responding. IAT consists of a task of doublecategorization whereby the respondents have to sort the stimuli belonging tosuperordinated categories.Study objective. The main objective of the study was to investigate theconvergent and discriminative validity of IAT in the assessment of basic personalitytraits.Method. To investigate the relations between the implicit and explicit measures,Implicit Association Tests, several self-report measures, ratings by close others, andmeasures of cognitive abilities were administered to a sample of 224 university studentsat Belgrade University. Ratings by experts and linguistic measures were collected froma subsample of 99 subjects. The respondents completed the personality IAT, NEO-PIRand DELTA10 (S and R form), a short scale of attributes (DOCEAN), a shortquestionnaire for the assessment of relevant moderator variables, KOG9 battery test forthe assessment of intellectual abilities, and self-assessment of intellectual abilities. Inaddition, they were observed by experts in structured interviews, in which linguisticparameters were collected through an automatic text analysis (LIWC).Results. The correlations between the self-reported and IAT Neuroticism (0.17)and Extraversion (0.16) were found to be small but significant (p<0.05). However, noneof the paths from the personality IAT to the corresponding latent traits in SEMCorrelated-Traits-Correlated-Uniqueness-MTMM-Model was significant. The modelhad the excellent fit: c2=338.18, p=0.00; RMSEA=0.042 (90% CI RMSEA 0.031-0.053), SRMR=0.066 and CFI=0.96. The MTMM analyses on a subsample of 99respondents, from which behavioural measures were collected, demonstrated relationsivbetween IAT and the parameters collected with automatic text analysis (LIWC).Subsequent analyses demonstrated a strong divergence between implicit and explicitmethod factors.Conclusion. Study has shown that the personality IAT measures have little incommon with personality traits measured by the traditional self-report inventories orrating scales. However, MTMM analysis provides evidence about the predictive validityof IAT in spontaneous verbal behaviour.

Relations between implicit and explicit measures of personality - prospects of Implicit Association Test (IAT) in assessment of basic personality traits