English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The focus of this paper is to analyze the effects of shareholder primacy governance on creditors, the characteristics of the firm, and how creditors can protect themselves. The governance of the firm is legally vested on directors and the law places on them specific duties requiring them to act in a certain way to promote the success of the company. The governance of the firm has evolved to be known as corporate governance. The mode of corporate governance such as the shareholder oriented governance and the characteristics that come with the firm (legal personality and limited liability) have negative implications on creditors. Shareholder primacy model of corporate governance seems to find its support from the Companies Act so does limited liability which limits the liability of the Members to the subscribed shares. Legal personality of the firm means that the firm is a juristic person with rights and obligations of a natural person in that it can own its own property. The presence of limited liability brings about the shareholder primacy model of governance. The problem is not the shareholders but the foundation on which they find there protection which is the law. With the presence of the above concepts, the implication on creditors is higher risk. This paper argues that if creditors’ interests are taken into account from inception, creditors will be better protected as they would be an ongoing concern for the company. Although the law provides circumstances when the corporate veil can be pierced as a mechanism to protect creditors, it is argued in this paper that clear and concise rules must be put in place as to when the veil can be pieced. * Post graduate researcher at University of Huddersfield; Eneless.Nyoni@hud.ac.uk ** Principle lecturer, School of Law University of Huddersfield; T.S.Hart@hud.ac.uk Intereulaweast, Vol. V (2) 2018 310 This paper contributes to literature on the protection of creditors in light of limited liability and within corporate governance. It also makes recommendations to change the law thereby contributing to policy makers to include creditors when governing the firm. The article uses the doctrinal approach to analyze the law on the protection of creditors by a critical examination of the section 172(1) and section 830 of the Companies Act.

THE CONCEPT OF LIMITED LIABILITY AND THE PLIGHT OF CREDITORS WITHIN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND COMPANY LAW: A UK PERSPECTIVE