z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Dip Constrained Migration Velocity Analysis and Interpretative processing
Author(s) -
Luiz Alberto Santos,
Eduardo Silva,
Jessé da Costa
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
proceedings of the 16th international congress of the brazilian geophysical societyandexpogef
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.22564/16cisbgf2019.349
Subject(s) - geology , inversion (geology) , regularization (linguistics) , set (abstract data type) , structural basin , interpretation (philosophy) , computer science , work (physics) , data processing , seismology , geophysics , petrology , geomorphology , database , artificial intelligence , engineering , programming language , mechanical engineering
In pre-stack depth migration processing f low, there is the important step of v elocity estimation. Migration v elocity Analy sis (MVA) is one of most used method in the seismic industry . In this work we describe the MVA workf low that takes into account the dip of lay ers to automatically increase geologic inf ormation as a regularization procedure in inv ersion. We apply the workf low in a real data set f rom Campos Basin detailing the shallow region. The experiment clearly shows the importance of interpretation team interacting during processing. Particularly f or the studied area, MVA deliv ers v elocity field consistent with geologic ev olution of the site. Introduction Seismic workf low in oil industry is composed of three main phases: acquisition, processing and interpretation. Usually those phases hav e sharp limits. In pre-stack depth migration processing f low, there is the important step of v elocity estimation. Migration v elocity Analy sis (MVA) is one of the most used method in seismic industry . The objectiv e of MVA workf low (Figure 1) is the estimation of a v elocity f ield f or depth migration f or best imaging. Sometimes best imaging does not mean geologically f easible v elocity model. This subject has been addres s ed by some authors. Delprat-Janaud and Lailly (1992) compute numerical uncertainties that approximate the phy sical uncertainties. They limit the study to Hilbertian model spaces and deriv e necessary and suf f icient condition which y ields the desired result the norm chosen in model space has to bind the Frechet deriv ativ e of the f orward map. Clapp et al. (2002) use nonstationary operators that tend to spread inf ormation along structural dips of lay ers in tomographic process. Costa et al. (2008) propose a ref lection-angle-based kind of smoothness constraint as regularization in slope tomography . Santos et al. (2013) quantif y the gradients dif f erences of veloci t y and amplitude v olumes in a parameter called Geological Incoherence Index (GII). Luo et al. (2017) propose anisotropic dif f usion smoothing operators into the conjugate gradient algorithm to precondition tomography . We dev eloped and apply the structure tensor based regularization in MVA process using a workf low that includes av ailable geological inf ormation. With an example of Campos Basin dataset we show adv antages and limitation of this process.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom