English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The article discusses the relationship between literary criticism and canon in the Cuban cultural field. It evaluates the interventions of literary criticism generically marked in the reconfiguration of the national literary canon. I argue that literary criticism in Cuba (patriarchal, hegemonic, authoritarian) is traditionally based on myths constructed onto the authors' literature, in particular myths about its alleged precariousness, ahistoricity and inferiority, which have served as arguments for more deliberate forms of discrimination. The article analyzes essays and literary criticism written by Cuban academics (Luisa Campuzano, Nara Araujo, Mirta Yanez, Susana Montero, Zaida Capote) from a consciously assumed gender perspective. It offers an overview of the development of gender studies in Cuba from the 1980s to 2012.

La Reconfiguración del Canon Literario Cubano: Crítica Literaria Contemporánea y Perspectiva de Género en Cuba (1989 – 2012)