English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Much of our understanding of Earth’s hydro-climate history comes from proxies for the δ18O and δD of environmental waters (e.g. precipitation, seawater, groundwater, lake water, permafrost, ice; smerdon et al. 2017). the δ18O and δD of environmental waters are recorded by sensors in a range of natural archives, such as glacier and ground ice, speleothems, corals, sclerosponges, lake and marine sediments, and tree rings. Despite this diversity, reconstructed δ18O and δD can track common environmental signals such as moisture source and air mass transport history, precipitation characteristics, and temperature (Dansgaard 1964), and thus provide invaluable comparison targets for global climate models (schmidt et al. 2014). However, no comprehensive synthesis of proxy δ18O or δD yet exists in a format suitable for regional-scale climate reconstructions or for data-model comparisons.

Assessing hydroclimate patterns of the past 2000 years with paleo-δ18O and δD records