English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The objective of this paper is on the one hand, to examine the differences of legal audit of four countries especially Canada, France, Japan and Denmark pertaining to four different judicial systems. In addition, to wonder about the factors which can influence audit quality assurance, particularly, those relating to judicial system of country, growth opportunities and ownership structure. The empirical results show, initially, that specificities of judicial system are positively associated with audit quality assurance appreciated by the size of audit firms. Then, growth opportunities influences partially the size of audit firms. Lastly, ownership structure does not seem to have a significant impact on the search for a high audit quality.

Study of explanatory factors of audit quality assurance: comparison of Canada, France, Japan and Denmark cases