English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In this paper, we examine an important part of the total Greek economy, which consists of Greek Listed companies and their subsidiaries and affiliates. We analyse the composition of their Boards of Directors, trying to outline any conclusions in the relation between the mobility of those members and the creation of the financial crisis. The results of this study are very important to outline any conclusions and also give us a clearer perspective, in relation to the directions which may be attributed shares responsibility for the phenomenon of crisis. We stood on it because the the Greek economy has of constant degradation prevented the influx of capital from prospective investors. In order to achieve a flow of investments, a significant volume of data and information (qualitative and quantitative) need to be available as open sources. The adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards plays a key role in the disclosure achievement of high levels of requirements (Athianos & Dimitras, 2017). Therefore, the mobility and duality of members of boards of directors should be disclosed to any potential investor of the companies were listed in Athens Stock Exchange (Buch-Hansen, 2014). Any lack of disclosure will probably create a considerable suspicion that the people of the Board manipulate the relative data and information to mislead the investing public (Jensen, 2001; Stout, 2012). The remainder of the paper is set out as follows. In section 2 we briefly review the relevant and in social literature on corporate governance section 3, we describe the analysis. In network employed The the variables. define dataset and methodology also presented in this section. Research analysis and results are presented in the 4 section, while discussion on the results including with together research implications for further limitations final The 5. section in provided is , section concludes. Abstract

Corporate governance and social networks: The relationship between the board of directors and earnings management