English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Most scientists agree that it is imperative to read the literature in their immediate field of interest hot off the press to keep abreast of the latest advances. They build on a more extensive body of knowledge which is the result of past explorations and discoveries by persons working in the same discipline. Generally it is almost irrelevant how the current consensus was reached or which people were responsible for it, unless a discovery or theory represented a major breakthrough. The history of a given subject is of course highly interesting, and any scientist would be advised to pay attention to the lives of their predecessors in their speciality. While for the majority of scientists such historical insight is largely optional, it often appears that students of animal taxonomy have much less choice. Animal and plant biodiversity is so immense that a revision must necessarily take into account all previous studies of the specimens and populations now combined in a certain species or higher ranking group. We are bound to respect the decisions and models of previous generations of taxonomists, although we have every right to fine-tune them or even dismiss them completely.

Rhino systematics in the times of Linnaeus, Cuvier, Gray and Groves