English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Languages are designed for talking about events and situations (for brevity’s sake I will use ‘event’ to cover both).1 The quintessential means for constructing word-pictures of events are sentence-sized constructions in which acts, processes and states and their participants can be analytically specified—represented by words and phrases that are assigned grammatical roles, as verb, subject, direct object, etc. As the senses provide the basis of human experience of the world, it is of some interest to compare the way different languages represent sensing events and to consider explanations for the commonalities and the differences. This essay compares the way sensing events are depicted in English and in Kalam, a language of the Trans New Guinea family. Some striking differences in syntactic and semantic representations are found.

The depiction of sensing events in English and Kalam