English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Design science has been an important strategy in decision support systems (DSS) research since the inception of the field in the early 1970s. Recent reviews of DSS research have indicated a need to improve its quality and relevance. DSS design science has an important role in this improvement as design science can engage industry and the profession in intellectually important projects. The 2004 publication of the Hevner, March, Park and Ram (HMPR) guidelines for the conduct and assessment of information systems design science provides a vehicle for assessing DSS design science. This chapter presents research that uses bibliometric content analysis to apply the HMPR guidelines to a representative sample of DSS design-science papers in 14 journals. The analysis highlights issues that need attention—notably, evaluation, research design, strategic focus and theorising. Comments are also offered on the experience of applying the HMPR guidelines to a large body of research.

An assessment of DSS design science using the Hevner, March, Park and Ram guidelines