English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

While goal-directed problem solving as advocated by Herbert Simon's means-ends analysis model has primarily shaped the course of design research on artificially intelligent systems, we contend that there is a definite disregard of a key phase within the overall design process that in fact logically precedes the problem-solving phase. While the systems designers have been obsessed with goal-directed problem solving, the basic determinants of the desired goal state remain to be fully understood or categorically defined. We propose an argumentative framework built on a set of logically interlinked conjectures that seeks to specifically highlight the importance of this hitherto neglected phase in the overall design process of intelligent systems.

Thinking beyond means–ends analysis: the role of impulse-driven human creativity in the design of artificially intelligent systems