English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In the period of Indigenous ‘self-determination’, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander representatives have moved between the public service and Indigenous organisations. In this chapter, I will draw on normative political theory to argue that such movements have contributed to selfdetermination in a way that was anticipated by a neglected source of advice on Indigenous administration and representation: the 1974–76 Royal Commission on Australian Government Administration (‘the Royal Commission’), chaired by H. C. Coombs.1 The Royal Commission commenced one year after the Whitlam Government had announced a policy to ‘restore to the Aboriginal people of Australia their lost power of self-determination in economic, social and political affairs’ on 6 April 1973.2 Although the Royal Commission did not use the term ‘selfdetermination’, its recommendations on how to encourage Aboriginal participation in government, I will argue, canvassed the central issues that

Self-determination through administrative representation: Insights from theory, practice and history