English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This chapter builds its argument on a relational understanding of hybridity, focusing on hybridisation—of peace, governance, security, sociopolitical order—as an ongoing process of becoming through mixing, reconverting, leaching and blending. The concept of hybridisation tries to capture the fluid, dynamic, emergent and relational quality of the reality it is meant to grasp.1 Talking about the process of hybridisation allows us to shift attention from fixed entities to relations.2 Let us be reminded that protagonists of the hybridity approach initially introduced the term into the scholarly debate about peacebuilding not least with the aim of overcoming reductive dichotomies, to open space for reflection about enmeshment, permeation, interpenetration, liminality, entanglement, fluidity, slippage, ambiguity, in-betweenness, dynamics and relations, with the shift away from binaries as ‘the primary appeal of hybridity and hybridisation’.3

Hybridisation of Peacebuilding at the Local–International Interface: The Bougainville Case