English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

[T]he anti-kinship views of ... David Schneider have been influential ... out of proportion to their good sense ... I have often wondered how or why it is that such logically and empirically shoddy claims got to be so widely accepted ... Many anthropological lemmings, infatuated with radical cultural constructionism ... have blindly followed [him] over a cliff. Paying no attention to or even denying the validity of a distinction between the literal and the metaphoric, they have enabled themselves to create numerous esoteric ‘others’ whose ‘relationship systems’ are for the most part nothing more than clones of Schneider’s interpretation of ‘American kinship’ ... They would thereby open the way for virtually endless commodity differentiation unconstrained by even the most minimal standards of intellectual or social value (Scheffler 2003: 341–43).

Hal Scheffler Versus David Schneider and His Admirers, in the Light of What We Now Know About Trobriand Kinship