English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

• fertility: the number of live births within a population, with a particular interest in the age women have babies and how many they have over their life time • mortality: not only how many people die, but also what age they die, and • migration: where are people moving to and from, how long are they moving for, how old are they when they move (Swanson and Siegel 2004). To understand the demography of Indigenous Australians these are fundamental components that require investigation, and this necessitates counts of people, births and deaths by the Indigenous status of individuals. In Australia our statistical systems remain less than reliable in terms of providing us with population data for the Indigenous population (Johnstone 2009; Taylor 2009). Indeed, Len Smith described Australia’s inability to reliably measure Indigenous life expectancy ‘a frank failure of the statistical system’ (Smith, Barnes and Choi 2008). This paucity of good quality data for Australia’s Indigenous population means specialised data systems such as the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Survey (NATSISS) are particularly welcomed. As Taylor (2009: 119) noted in relation to research on Indigenous demography:

Fertility and the demography of Indigenous Australians: What can the NATSISS 2008 tell us?