English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

  The optimization of multi-objective problems from the Pareto dominance viewpoint can lead to huge sets of incomparable solutions. Many heuristic techniques proposed to these problems have to deal with approximation sets that can be limited or not. Usually, a new solution generated by a heuristic is compared with other archived non-dominated solutions generated previously. Many techniques deal with limited size archives, since comparisons within unlimited archives may require significant computational effort. To maintain limited archives, solutions need to be discarded. Several techniques were proposed to deal with the problem of deciding which solutions remain in the archive and which are discarded. Previous investigations showed that those techniques might not prevent deterioration of the archives. In this study, we propose to store discarded solutions in a secondary archive and, periodically, recycle them, bringing them back to the optimization process. Three recycling techniques were investigated for three known methods. The datasets for the experiments consisted of 91 instances of discrete and continuous problems with 2, 3 and 4 objectives. The results showed that the recycling method can benefit the tested optimizers on many problem classes.

Investigation of Archiving Techniques for Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimizers