English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Establishing research and innovation priorities is a permanent concern in the governance of science and technology, because it permeates the definition of the objects of study, the allocation of resources by the State and the social appropriation of results. This article analyzes the State Road maps for Innovation in Mexico, a program promoted by the Mexican government to define innovation priorities at the state level. Analytically, the study is based on the governance modes typology by Hagendijk & Irwin (2006) with the purpose of examining the extent to which this instrument shows progress in democratizing the governance of science in the country. Methodologically, the information of the road maps was systematized and semi-structured interviews with key actors were conducted. It is concluded that the road maps coincide with the modes of market-based and discretionary-based governance since the priority issues represent the interests of the country’s business and governing elite. It is hypothesized that in the road maps there are several elements that point the orientation of science towards a market logic aligned with the neo-extractivism, which is expanding in the Latin American region.

Las agendas estatales de innovación en México: ¿gobernanza científica discrecional o de mercado?