English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

espanolEl estudio que propicio este proyecto consistio en un analisis comparativo entre lenguajesvisuales y lenguajes textuales. En este caso especifico se emplearon el calculo textual PiCO(creado el 1996 por el grupo Avispa de las universidades del Valle y Javeriana) y el calculovisual GraPiCO (desarrollado tambien por Avispa en el 2000). Sus objetivos fueron, establecerde manera basica que percepcion tiene un usuario frente a estos dos tipos de lenguajes; ytratar de encontrar bajo que circunstancias se considera que un tipo de lenguaje se comportamejor que el otro. Recuerdese al respecto el refran popular “una imagen vale mas que milpalabras”, pero tambien puede ser cierto aquel que dice “una palabra dice mas que milimagenes”. Para dar respuesta a estos interrogantes, se diseno un experimento compuestopor varias sesiones en las que se visitaron las principales universidades de Santiago de Cali(Colombia) y se realizaron jornadas pedagogicas, evaluaciones y encuestas. Asi, se midieronlos niveles de asimilacion, aprehension y aceptacion de estos dos lenguajes de programacionpor parte de una poblacion escogida bajo ciertos parametros especificos. Para realizarel material audiovisual empleado en las reuniones didacticas fue necesaria la creacion yadopcion de una metodologia que garantizara su eficacia comunicativa, principal aporte delestudio que aqui se presenta paso a paso. Se concluye que la metodologia usada condujoa la elaboracion de materiales audiovisuales efectivos y contundentes. EnglishThe study that gave rise to the research project discussed in this paper is a comparative analysis of visual andtextual languages. In this case, the textual calculus PiCO (created in 1996 by Avispa research group at Universidaddel Valle and Universidad Javeriana) and the visual calculus GraPiCO (also developed by Avispa in 2000) wereused. The project’s goals were to establish in a basic way what perceptions does a user have when confrontedwith these two types of languages, as well as to find under what circumstances will it be considered that a givenlanguage performs better than the other. In this sense, let us remember the popular saying “a picture is worth athousand words”, but also, “a word tells more tan a thousand images”. To answer these questions, an experimentconsisting of several sessions was designed: The top 5 universities in Santiago de Cali were visited and pedagogicalworkshops, evaluations and surveys were performed. Thus, levels of assimilation, apprehension and acceptanceof these two programming languages from a population selected according to certain specific parameters weremeasured. In order to produce the audiovisual material used in the learning sessions, a methodology was createdand adopted for ensuring its communicative efficacy, and it became the main contribution of the study, it isintroduced step by step in this paper. It is concluded that the methodology led to the development of effectiveand convincing audiovisual material.

Experiencia de colaboración entre Comunicación Social e Ingeniería Informática para la realización de videos educativos