English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Objective: To characterize the latency time, depth time and total duration time of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine- both with 1:100,000 epinephrine - during the extraction through odontosection of impacted mandibular third molars by means of a truncal anesthesia technique. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study of case series selected by a non-probabilistic sampling was conducted on 27 subjects who underwent extraction through odontosection of impacted mandibular third molars using either 4% articaine or 2% lidocaine- both with 1:100,000 epinephrine. A procedure related data collection ensued. Results: Total duration time of anesthetic effect showed a statistical significant longer effect when using 4% articaine in comparison with 2% lidocaine. Whereas, neither latency time nor anesthetic depth time showed any statistical significant difference.   Conclusion: 4% articaine provides a greater total duration time of anesthetic effect, so it should be  preferred for long-term procedures, allowing greater post-operative comfort. Objective: To characterize the latency time, depth time and total duration time of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine- both with 1:100,000 epinephrine - during the extraction through odontosection of impacted mandibular third molars by means of a truncal anesthesia technique. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study of case series selected by a non-probabilistic sampling was conducted on 27 subjects who underwent extraction through odontosection of impacted mandibular third molars using either 4% articaine or 2% lidocaine- both with 1:100,000 epinephrine. A procedure related data collection ensued. Results: Total duration time of anesthetic effect showed a statistical significant longer effect when using 4% articaine in comparison with 2% lidocaine. Whereas, neither latency time nor anesthetic depth time showed any statistical significant difference. Conclusion: 4% articaine provides a greater total duration time of anesthetic effect, so it should be preferred for long-term procedures, allowing greater post-operative comfort.

Caracterización de lidocaína y articaína mediante técnica troncular en exodoncias de terceros molares inferiores incluidos