English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Science communication is inside a hard but important moment. When scientific controversies make the news, they are more often spawned by industry elites and celebrities who refute scientific work than by scientists. When the current U.S. president came into power, his administration scrubbed all mentions of climate from the White House website. Earth Day is now a March for Science. As scholars develop our research programs, we are faced with questions of how to orient our work to speak to other scientists, to the general public, and to this administration. We are learning that facts are not just facts but are pieces of complex sociopolitical flows. We are learning firsthand that the possibility for evidence-based policy is not based on evidence but on culture, politics and capitalism. We are all struggling with the current moment, particularly with how to communicate about and within this new gaze upon science that makes scientists feel silenced or even marginalized.

Technoscience in the era of #MeToo and the science march