English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this post scriptum, we seek to update the trajectory of the National Program for Strengthening Family Farming (Pronaf) since we published, in 2004, the book chapter that is reissued in this dossier. We did not intend to make an extensive review of the debates and analyzes carried out by the plethora of scholars who dealt with the topic since then, because we just want to present our impressions and points of view on the achievements and limits of the Program. We try to present a constructive criticism, especially with regard to aspects related to the scope and management of the program, such as the southern bias of family farming, the concentration of resources in some specific strata and the eligibility restrictions to some farm units that have income from non-agricultural sources. We argue that these aspects deserve adjustments and that Pronaf needs to become more socially inclusive and better aligned with the assumptions of sustainable rural development. Key-words: Brazil; Public Policy; Family Farming; Pronaf. RESUMEN En este post scriptum, buscamos actualizar la trayectoria del Programa Nacional para Fortalecer la Agricultura Familiar (Pronaf) desde que publicamos, en 2004, el capítulo del libro que se reedita en este dossier. No teníamos la intención de hacer una revisión exhaustiva de los debates y análisis llevados a cabo por la gran cantidad de académicos que trataron el tema, simplemente presentamos nuestras impresiones y puntos de vista sobre el alcance y los límites del Programa. Tratamos de presentar una crítica constructiva, especialmente con respecto a los aspectos relacionados con el alcance y la gestión del programa, como el sesgo sureño de la agricultura familiar, la concentración de recursos en algunos estratos específicos y las restricciones de elegibilidad en las unidades de producción que tienen ingresos de Fuentes no agrícolas. Argumentamos que estos aspectos merecen ajustes y que Pronaf necesita ser más socialmente inclusivo y estar mejor alineado con los supuestos del desarrollo rural sostenible. Palabras chave: Brasil; Política pública; Agricultura familiar; Pronaf.

POST SCRIPTUM AO ARTIGO “HISTÓRICO, CARACTERIZAÇÃO E DINÂMICA RECENTE DO PRONAF - PROGRAMA NACIONAL DE FORTALECIMENTO DA AGRICULTURA FAMILIAR”