English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Master Thesis, Physical Educatıon and Sports Department In this working, it is examined that woman footballers’ some physical appropriateness rate according to their playing position and age. A hundred football volunteer -aged between 14-30 from Gazikentsport and Fıstıksports’ both A team and infrastructure team,in Turkey Football Woman First League, joined in this working. Footballers were grouped according to playing positions as a goalkeeper,defence,halfback and forward. Body composition,flexibility, 10 and 20 metres speed,20 metres shuttle run (VO2max),sargent jump and reach,agility tests were applied. In investigating footballers’ sport age and positions, analysis of variance techniques in factorial arrangement was used.Also,in determining different groups,Tukey quantified predicate test was used. Footballers’, over 18 years,sport age, body weight,body fat (VY%), sargent jump and reach,height are more meaningful than 17 aged footballers (p<0,05). Statistically footballers‘ playing positions cause important changes only on body weight, height and sargent jump and reach Goalkeepers’ sargent jump averages are higher than halfback players. 17 and less aged groups‘ VO2max average is significantly higher than over 18 years sportswoman group.It is important to know the features of football’s physic and performance according to playing positions and age groups. Because trainers and players can evaluate themselves thanks to this results. The Online Journal of Recreation and Sport – October 2017 Volume 6, Issue 4 www.tojras.com Copyright © The Online Journal of Recreation and Sport 29 INTRODUCTION By the participation of women in football increased, in addition to being psychologically strong women must be physically strong, too (Konter, 1998). The players need the physical and physiological power necessary for the football game they play. Having a good body composition due to the fact that it is a game that requires long-lasting durability can increase the success of the athlete by ensuring that the performance of the athlete reaches the highest level during the match (Sezgin et al., 2011). There are differences in the physical, physiological and motoric performances of football players playing in different positions in the football. For this reason, although the football is a team game, the training programs applied to the football players should be arranged according to the game position of each football player (Toluay, 2014). It is contemplated that in a soccer game there will be differences between the positions of the goalkeeper, defense, midfield and offensive players due to the positions and duties they play, the distance they are running, the severity of the run, the frequency and the duration. In this respect, it is important for the players to show their physical and physiological characteristics in different positions, and to change over the years according to age groups. METHOD This work, representing the province of Gaziantep Turkey Women's Football League, from Gazikent Sports, Fıstık Spor and it’s the infrastructure team 100 footballers between the ages of 14 and 30 participated in research. Football players were analyzed according to place they play such as keeper, defender, midfielder and striker, and according to age groups, they were analyzed in two groups as 17 and under, 18 and over. All the necessary informants about the work were done and a certificate of affirmation indicating that the participation was based on voluntary principle was taken. Both study groups located for making a time measurement of the players, age, height, weight, body fat percentage, flexibility, vertical jump, agility measurement, 20 meters shuttle run 10 meters and 20 meters speed measurements (VO 2 max) tests were applied. Collection of Data Age, Height and Body Weight Measurement The Online Journal of Recreation and Sport – October 2017 Volume 6, Issue 4 www.tojras.com Copyright © The Online Journal of Recreation and Sport 30 According to the age of the footballers and the identity information, the length was made with a stadiometer (SECA, Germany) with a sensitivity level of 0.01 m and an electronic scale (SECA, Germany) with a sensitivity level of 0.1 kg.(Ekizler et al., 2006). Body fat percentage (%) Skin fold thickness measurements sample were taken from triceps, subscapular, suprailiac, and abdominal locations and skinfold caliper (Holtain, UK) was used for measurements. The caliper was placed approximately 1 cm away from the fingers and the thickness of the subcutaneous fat layer was recorded in millimeters by reading within 2-3 seconds of the markers on the caliper (Harrison et al., 1998; Zorba et al., 1995). In determining the percentage of fat in subjects, the Yuhasz body fat formula was used (Gribble, 2004). Flexibility Measurement Elasticity measurements were made with the sit-and-reach test. The soccer player's bare soles are based on the test stand, sitting at the base, stretching forward without bending their knees, extending forwardly pushes the ruler on the table and from 2 seconds to stop yawning provided to extend the maximum distance was recorded (Özer, 2001; Tamer, 2000). Agility Measurement Agility was tested using a zig-zag test with four 5-meter sections starting at a 100degree angle. All tests were conducted on a synthetic enclosure, electronic time instruments have been used to record completion times. Two attempts were made for each zig-zag test with a rest of at least 2 minutes between soccer test and rest. Best performance recorded. Each straight sprint has been determined at 5 meters and each turn in the flags at 100 degrees (Lıttle, 2005). Vertical Splash Footballers are hoping to jump as high as possible with double legs in front of the wall hanging platform. Before the test, the normal arm length was determined in front of the platform to be tested. As a result of the test, the difference between the jump distance and the The Online Journal of Recreation and Sport – October 2017 Volume 6, Issue 4 www.tojras.com Copyright © The Online Journal of Recreation and Sport 31 arm length was determined and the vertical jump distance was recorded in cm. The test was repeated twice and the best results were recorded (Günay et al., 2006; Tamer, 1995). 10 Meters Speed Measurement Soccer players are required to run 10 m at high speed with the sign of exit being held in the ready position one meter behind the starting photocell. Measurements were made with the photocells placed at the start and end of the 10 meters running distance. The test was performed two times and the best rating was recorded (Mendes et al., 2015). 20 Meters Speed Measurement The footballers were kept in the ready position one meter behind the starting photocell and were allowed to run 20 m at maximum speed together with the sign of exit. The measurements were made with photocells placed at the beginning and end of the 20 meters running distance. The test was performed two times and the best rating recorded (Hindistan et al., 1999). Indirect Measurement of Maximal Oxygen Consumption Capacity (VO2Max ml/kg/dk / min) A 20 meters shuttle running test was used for football's VO2Max prediction. The test is a test that starts at a running speed of 8,5 km / h and runs at a speed of 0.5 km. sup. -1 for every 1 minute running and 20 meters distance round trip. according to the protocol of 20 m shuttle run test cassette is used to determine the running speed. The test was terminated when the player was unable to catch up with the two signals or left the test. According to the result obtained, the soccer players' VO2Max values were recorded in ml / kg / min.(Tamer, 2000). Statistical analysis In the classification of the data obtained at the end of the research and the calculation of the percentage differences, the factorial level Variance Analysis Technique was used. The Tukey Multiple Comparison Test was used to identify the different groups. The statistical analyzes were performed using Minitabfor Windows v.17.0 and SPSS for Windows ver.20.0 packet programs. Statistical results were evaluated at 95% confidence interval and p <0.05 significance level. The Online Journal of Recreation and Sport – October 2017 Volume 6, Issue 4 www.tojras.com Copyright © The Online Journal of Recreation and Sport 32 RESULTS Table 1. General descriptive statistics and multiple comparison results according to age groups Features Age Groups N Min. Max. SPORT AGE(year) 17 YEARS AND UNDER 41 2,537 ± 0,153 b 1.000 4.000 18 YEARS AND OLDER 48 3,896 ± 0,288 a 1.000 9.000 WEIGHT(kg) 17 YEARS AND UNDER 41 46,927 ± 0,754 b 38.000 57.000 18 YEARS AND OLDER 48 53,292 ± 0,841 a 43.000 70.000 HEIGHT(cm) 17 YEARS AND UNDER 41 1,574 ± 0,012 b 1,4 1,72 18 YEARS AND OLDER 48 1,642 ± 0,008 a 1,5 1,73 BMI(kg/m2) 17 YEARS AND UNDER 41 18,973 ± 0,296 15,625 23,139 18 YEARS AND OLDER 48 19,752 ± 0,299 16,4 27,1 RESTING PULSE 17 YEARS AND UNDER 41 92,200 ± 1,680 a 72.000 124.000 18 YEARS AND OLDER 48 87,080 ± 1,110 b 68.000 104.000 BODY FAT %(mm) 17 YEARS AND UNDER 41 5,788 ± 0.000 b 5,788 5,788 18 YEARS AND OLDER 48 12,806 ± 0,292 a 10,516 20,904 FLEXIBILTY(cm) 17 YEARS AND UNDER 41 7,061 ± 0,908 -7,3 21,9 18 YEARS AND OLDER 48 10,692 ± 0,688 -1,3 18,2 VERTICAL SPLASH(cm) 17 YEARS AND UNDER 41 27,049 ± 0,876 b 16.000 41.000 18 YEARS AND OLDER 48 31,438 ± 0,856 a 20.000 43.000 AGILITY(sec) 17 YEARS AND UNDER 41 6,711 ± 0,075 5,83 7,5 18 YEARS AND OLDER 48 6,664 ± 0,076 5,05 7,8 10 M SPEED(sec) 17 YEARS AND UNDER 41 1,891 ± 0,028 1,56 2,25 18 YEARS AND OLDER 48 5,900 ± 4,040 1,24 196.000 20 M SPEED(sec) 17 YEARS AND UNDER 41 3,362 ± 0,030 2,91 3,69 18 YEARS AND OLDER 48 3,408 ± 0,038 2,86 3,95

ANALYSING WOMAN FOOTBALLERS^SOME PHYSICAL RATES ACCORDING TO THEIR PLAYING POSITIONS AND AGES