English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Skepticism is a philosophical doctrine that in professional practice contributes to Public Accounting professionals to acquire an approach based on doubt about the veracity and consistency of the information they should review during the performance of an audit. Doubts that lead him to corroborate each support found in the process and that allow him to have sufficient bases to issue reliable financial opinions. This work presents a literary review that explores the elements that influence professional skepticism in public accountants who act as auditors. This research was carried out using a descriptive and exploratory qualitative approach based on existing literature. In this study, it was found that independence, personal bias and conflicts of interest are key factors that improve or impair professional skepticism in the execution of the audit engagement.

Nociones del escepticismo profesional del Contador Público en ejercicio de las auditorías: una perspectiva teórica