Tratamiento farmacológico para COVID-19 en protocolos latinoamericanos: Una revisión narrativa de la eficacia y seguridad
Author(s) -
Centro Brasileiro de Informação sobre Medicamentos, Conselho Federal de Farmácia. Brasília, DF, Brasil,
Pamela Alejandra Escalante Saavedra,
Martín Cañás,
CIMEFF Área de Farmacología, Federación Médica de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (FEMEBA), La Plata, Argentina,
Dulce María Calvo Barbado,
Asesora independiente, Barcelo España,
Liliana Barajas Esparza,
Instituto de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Pachuca de Soto, Hidalgo, México,
Mariana Caffaratti,
Centro de Información de Medicamentos, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina,
Noelia Speranza,
Departamento de Farmacología y Terapéutica, Facultad de Medici Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay,
Carlos Martinez,
Centro de Información de Medicamentos CIME, Acción Internacional por la Salud (AIS Nicaragua), Matagalpa, Nicaragua,
José Julián López G,
Departamento de Farmacia, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
Publication year - 2020
Language(s) - English
DOI - 10.22239/2317-269x.01741
Subject(s) - covid-19 , medicine , lopinavir , pandemic , ritonavir , intensive care medicine , family medicine , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , viral load , antiretroviral therapy , infectious disease (medical specialty) , disease
The pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has put the global scientific community in an accelerated pace of research for an effective treatment for COVID-19. Objective: To identify and evaluate drugs in Latin American protocols of pharmacological treatment for COVID-19. Method: The evidence and mega trial results available to date on the most frequent medications are analyzed. Results: The most common drugs in national protocols are hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, and remdesivir. None of the drugs that collect the most data from clinical studies, with the except for dexamethasone in a small subgroup of patients, so far showed significant differences in mortality. Conclusions: The emerging situation of COVID-19 has determined hasty and controversial decision-making based on questionable and/or low-quality studies. This highlights the provisional nature of the information and the possibility of generating changes as more results become available. Advance medication authorization exposes a known problem. Although regulatory agility is required at this time, speed should not overlap with basic ethical standards and trust in evidence.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom