English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

espanolEn el presente articulo, se consideran los inconvenientes generados ante la eleccion del foro previsto en el literal C del art. 7 del Protocolo de Buenos Aires sobre Jurisdiccion Internacional en Materia Contractual, a la luz de los aportes que la doctrina nacional ha efectuado al respecto y las consideraciones vertidas por el Tribunal de Apelaciones en lo Civil de 5° Turno en la Sentencia No. 100/2015 de fecha 18 de marzo de 2015. EnglishIn this article, we shall assess the inconveniences caused by the forum selection enshrined on Section 7, Subsection C of the Buenos Aires Protocol on International Jurisdiction on Contractual Matters, on the grounds of the contributions that local scholars have made in that regard and the considerations rendered by the Civil Appeals Court of 5th Term through Decision No. 100/2015, dated match 18th, 2015. portuguesNeste artigo, consideram-se os inconvenientes gerados antes da escolha do forum referida na clausula (C) do artigo 7o do protocolo de Buenos Aires sobre jurisdicao internacional em materia contratual, tendo em conta as contribuicoes que a doutrina nacional tem feita a este respeito e consideracoes expressadas pelo Tribunal de recurso em materia Civil de turno 5 ° no acordao n. o 100/2015 data de 18 de marco de 2015.

Practical inconsistencies arising from clause (C), article 7 of the Protocol of Buenos Aires on international jurisdiction in contractual matters