English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Existing schemes are based primarily on properties of the animals themselves, e.g., adult size, potential lifespan, physical or zoonotic risk to humans, how stressful the species may find captivity and human contact, is the animal captive bred or wild caught, and dietary and environmental needs – some of these factors determining the space, equipment, expense and knowledge-base required. Additional factors concern the availability of necessary resources in our society, including appropriate food, equipment, knowledge and informed veterinary care. Each factor varies across species in such a way as to influence the species’ difficulty-of-keeping and so risk of poor welfare in captivity. Human factors also vary across species in such a way as to influence the species’ welfare as pets, yet most of these important psychological and sociological factors are not included in existing schemes. These factors include human ability to recognise poor welfare in animals, empathy (the ability to perceive another’s condition from their perspective), emotional attachment to animals, and the species’ moral importance in our society.

Human psychological and sociological factors influencing the suitability of species to be pets