English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Neoendogenous approaches to community economic development have risen to prominence in recent years. The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has described such approaches as nothing less than “the new rural paradigm.” But is this paradigm reflected in practice? This research examines the community economic development landscape—from the perspectives of federal and provincial funders to that of community-based groups—through two Atlantic Canadian case studies (Marystown, Newfoundland and Labrador, and Montague, Prince Edward Island). Governmental funders are found to prioritize economic and business development objectives above social, cultural, and community-oriented ones. These preferences shape the types of projects that are funded and the community groups that propel them, undermining the adoption of truly neoendogenous, community-driven practices. Dans les dernieres annees, les approches neo-endogenes envers le developpement economique communautaire ont cru en importance. L’Organisation de cooperation et de developpement economiques (OECD) a decrit ces approches comme entrainant ni plus ni moins qu’un « nouveau paradigme rural ». Mais la pratique reflete-t-elle ce paradigme? Cette etude examine le contexte pour le developpement communautaire economique—du point de vue des subventionneurs federaux et provinciaux et de celui des groupes communautaires—au moyen de deux etudes de cas menees dans deux villes des provinces de l’Atlantique (c’est-a-dire Marystown, Terre-Neuve et Labrador, et Montague, Ile-du-Prince-Edouard). Il se trouve que les subventionneurs gouvernementaux donnent la priorite aux objectifs de developpement economique et commercial aux depens des objectifs sociaux, culturels et communautaires. Cette priorite a un impact sur les types de projets subventionnes et sur les groupes communautaires qui les appuient, entravant ainsi l’adoption de pratiques veritablement neo-endogenes dans les communautes.

Questioning Neoendogeneity: Cases of Community Economic Development Practice from Atlantic Canada