English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background  In early 2015, a few months after Postmedia Network, Canada’s largest newspaper company, purchased 175 Sun Media titles from Quebecor Inc., the Supreme Court of Canada rendered a landmark decision. It allowed the purchase of one hazardous waste company by another because the Competition Bureau, which had blocked the deal, failed to quantify the anti-competitive effects of the monopoly created. Analysis The ruling set an important precedent for the Postmedia purchase, which was approved by the Competition Bureau two months later. Conclusions and implications This article points up the problematic nature of competition cases involving news media companies and the need for reform of the Competition Act to prevent such cases from being decided solely on economic grounds, as now mandated by the Supreme Court. Keywords Newspapers; Postmedia; Competition Bureau; Press ownership concentration Contexte  Au debut de 2015, quelques mois apres que le plus grand groupe de presse au Canada, Postmedia Network, a achete les 175 journaux Sun Media de Quebecor Inc., la Cour supreme du Canada a pris une decision marquante. Elle a permis l’achat d’une compagnie de matieres dangereuses par une autre parce que le Bureau de la concurrence, qui avait bloque la transaction, avait echoue a quantifier les effets anticoncurrentiels du monopole qui s’ensuivrait. Analyse  Cette decision a constitue un precedent important pour l’achat par Postmedia que le Bureau de la concurrence approuverait deux mois plus tard. Conclusion et implications  Cet article souligne la nature problematique de cas de concurrence entre compagnies journalistiques et le besoin de reformer la Loi sur la concurrence afin d’empecher la prise de decisions sur une base economique seulement, a l’instar du verdict de la Cour supreme. Mots cles  Journaux; Postmedia; Bureau de la concurrence; Concentration des medias

News as Hazardous Waste: Postmedia, the Competition Bureau, and the Supreme Court of Canada