English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article analyzes the existence of definitions of crime in the Mexican legal system that restrict freedom of expression and that fall in the category of indirect restrictions, which are prohibited by the Constitution. It affirms that these definitions have an inhibiting effect of the diffusion of opinions, ideas and information in Mexico, for generating a type of self-censorship given that they prohibit, pursue and sanction conducts related to the obtention and spread of information, as well as other forms of expression. To demonstrate the thesis, firstly, the text conceptualizes freedom of expression and its importance, and highlights its dimensions: individual and social. Next, conceptual approaches to censorship, prior censorship, and self-censorship as restrictions on freedom of expression are made. Finally, by way of example, it reviews three analyzed cases by the Mexican Supreme Court in order to exemplify how these definitions were declared unconstitutional.

estudios en derecho a la información

Delitos restrictivos de la libertad de expresión y su inconstitucionalidad. Análisis de tres casos resueltos por la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación