English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The aim of this paper is to analyse some interpretative criteria that are followed in Argentine judicial practice when judges apply the rules that regulate the continuation of the company in bankruptcy by the workers. Following a temporal and jurisdictional criterion, our study focuses on resolutions pronounced by the Commercial Courts of Appeal in the last two years. The intention of this is to have a current outlook about how that jurisdictional organism has pronounced on the topic. We seek to demonstrate that judges justify mainly their decisions through a teleological argumentation, and that also they favour to optimize the fundamental right to work when consider all the interests in conflict in the bankruptcy legal process.

revista latinoamericana de derecho social

La continuación de la empresa en quiebra y la optimización del derecho a trabajar: algunos criterios interpretativos en la jurisprudencia nacional argentina