English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

This article analyzes doctrine and jurisprudence of Article 5.3 of the European Regulation (EC) 44/2001 Brussels I. Specifically, the analysis refers to the concept of “harmful event” on delict or quasi-delict (tort) civil for environmental damage. The rules of jurisdiction must be highly predictable. However, the concept “harmful event” may be a problem of interpretation when there is a relationship between environmental and civil damage. For this reason, it must be analyzed: a) the importance of civil damages, and b) the certainty of environmental damage. These issues justify different linking factor of international jurisdiction.

Lugar del hecho dañoso: foro de competencia internacional por daño ambiental. Experiencia europea