English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Pro

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Presents AI Discovery search usage as a premium feature

AI Discovery

Presents AI Discovery explain and summary usage as a premium feature

Content Analysis

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

1500 Top-up

3000 Top-up

Zendy Basic

2500 Top-up

Zendy Unlimited

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

IN THIS ARTICLE, THE AUTHOR ANALYSES THE DECISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REFERRED TO THE LAGRABD CASE, IN PARTICULAR WHAT CONCERNS THE IMPORTANCE AND EFFECTS OF PROVISIONAL MEASURES THAT CAN BE ISSUED BY SAID COURT OF JUSTICE DECLARED THAT THE USA HAD VIOLATED ARTICLE 36 OF THE VIENNA CONVENTION OF APRIL 24, 1963 ON CONSULAR RELATIONS, FOR SEVERAL REASONS. THE ESSAY EXPLAINS THE IMPORTANCE OF THE PRECEDENT PRODUCED BY THE COURT, BY ASSERTING THE LEGAL EFFECTS OF ITS DECISIONS THAT ORDER PROVISONAL MEASURES. WITH THIS DECISIONS, THE COURT DETERMINED THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE USA FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH ITS PROVISIONAL MEASURES; AND SHOWED THAT THE COURT CAN ACT WITH AFFICACY AND PROMPTLY IF THE CASE SO REQUIRES.

La sentencia de la Corte Internacional de Justicia del 27 de junio de 2001 en el caso LaGrand