English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Boethius distinguishes knowledge directed to the objects of reason (intelligible) from knowledge referring to the objects of pure thought (intellectible). This difference entails a type of knowledge understood as love to God as, on the one hand, every entity seeks the good with an ontological purpose; on the other hand, Boethius identifes the unity of God with the transcendental truth and good. The innate knowledge of God, which is the intellectible par excellence, coincides with the natural tendency oriented to the origin in which it is possible to fnd perfect happiness and beatitude.  This paper analyzes Boethius’ proposal of intellectible concepts as a contribution to a broader understanding of the transcendental concepts of being, on the basis of a participation ontology enriching the formal-categorial ontology used as the fundamentals of sciences.

Boecio: conocimiento intelectible y fundamento divino. Notas sobre el amor al bien como estructura metafísica de los entes.