English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

PURPOSETo evaluate the influence of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size on survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC).MATERIALS AND METHODSWe have retrospectively reviewed the records of 338 consecutive patients with pT1-3aN0M0 RCC, including 275 pT1-2 and 63 pT3a tumors, who underwent open partial or radical nephrectomy between 1995 and 2008. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed in order to evaluate the prognostic factors.RESULTSMedian follow-up period was 36.07 months. Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis determined the optimal tumor size cutoff value as 7 cm (Area Under the Curve: 0.65 ± 0.047; 95% Confidence Interval: 0.558 to 0.741). Perinephric fat invasion and Fuhrman grade were independent prognostic factors for disease-specific survival (DSS). In patients with tumor size >7 cm, perinephric fat invasion affected DSS significantly. Tumor size (according to the cutoff value of 7 cm) significantly affected DSS in patients with pT3a disease. According to the TNM 2002 staging system, perinephric fat invasion did not have any significant effect on DSS in patients with tumor size smaller than 4 cm, unlike tumor size of 4 to 7 cm and >7 cm. pT3a tumors larger than 7 cm demonstrated the worst prognosis compared to other groups.CONCLUSIONPerinephric fat invasion was demonstrated as a significant prognostic factor for RCC patients with tumor size >4 cm. Consequently, evaluation of pT3a patients should take tumor size into consideration for better prognostic analysis.

Significance of tumor size in renal cell cancer with perinephric fat infiltration: is TNM staging system adequate for predicting prognosis?