English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

This study examined differences in utilization of tenure clock extensions, one of the most common forms of faculty career flexibility, by faculty gender, race, and academic field, as well as differences in career outcomes, namely retention and tenure attainment, by whether an extension was received. Data were obtained from the personnel files of the 465 tenure-line faculty hired across a 7-year period at a large, public, doctoral/research extensive university. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests of independence and logistic regression. The study found differences by gender and academic field in who receives tenure clock extensions, as well as differences by gender and academic field in reasons for policy utilization. Receiving a tenure clock extension has no statistically significant relationship with attainment of tenure, but faculty who receive extensions have a higher rate of attrition.

Tenure Clock Extension Policies: Who Uses Them and to What Effect?