English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Does the Internet provide a failsafe against media consolidation in the wake of an easing of media ownership rules?  This paper posits a model of news outlet selection on the Internet in which consumers experience cognitive costs that increase with the number of options faced.  Consistent with psychological evidence, these costs may be reduced by constraining one's choice set to "safe bets" familiar from offline (e.g., CNN.com).  It is shown that, as the number of outlets grows, dispersion of patronage across outlets inevitably declines.  Consequently, independent Internet outlets may fail to mitigate lost outlet independence on other media.

Understanding the Internet's Relevance to Media Ownership Policy: A Model of Too Many Choices